Candleread
Options, Risk Math, and Psychology · Risk Math Deep Dive

The Kelly criterion, derived in plain English

Explain what the Kelly criterion is, how to compute it, and what it tells you about position size.

3 min read+25 XPLesson 38 of 75
Start reading

Lesson path

Options, Risk Math, and Psychology

Risk Math Deep Dive

Lesson 38 of 7551%
Lesson 38 of 75Options, Risk Math, and PsychologyRisk Math Deep Dive

Today's tiny win: make one idea click.

Explain what the Kelly criterion is, how to compute it, and what it tells you about position size.

Learn itSpot itPass the check

The Kelly criterion, plain English

The Kelly criterion is a position-sizing formula. It answers one question: given my winrate and my average win-to-loss ratio, what fraction of my account should I risk on this trade? It was developed by John Kelly Jr. at Bell Labs in 1956 and has been borrowed by gamblers, traders, and hedge funds ever since. The idea is simple: bet too small and you leave growth on the table; bet too big and a losing streak wipes you out. Kelly tries to find the sweet spot.

Wick shows a calculator reading 25% under the Kelly formula with a 50% win rate and a payoff of 2, showing how the formula turns your edge into a fraction.(0.5 x 2 - 0.5) / 2 = 0.2525%
Wick saysKelly turns your win rate and payoff into one number: the most you could risk.

Here's the formula. f* = (winrate x b − loss_rate) / b. The 'b' is your payoff ratio — your average win divided by your average loss. The 'loss_rate' is just 1 minus the winrate. Let's plug numbers in. Say you win 50% of the time, and when you win you make twice what you lose (b = 2). Kelly says f* = (0.5 x 2 − 0.5) / 2 = 0.5 / 2 = 0.25. Translation: bet 25% of your bankroll on each trade. On a $500 account, that's $125 of risk per trade.

Wick holds a big scoop labeled 25% = $125 next to a jar labeled $500 account, showing that full Kelly is a very large bite and only a ceiling.A ceiling, not a target$500account25% = $125
Wick saysOn $500, full Kelly says $125 a trade. That is the ceiling, not the goal.

Notice what the formula actually does. If you have NO edge — say a 50% winrate at b = 1 (you win and lose equal amounts) — Kelly gives you f* = (0.5 − 0.5) / 1 = 0. Bet nothing. If you have a negative edge — a 40% winrate at b = 1 — Kelly returns a negative number. Translation: don't take the trade at all. Kelly is honest in a way most position-sizing rules aren't.

Wick stands by a traffic light lit yellow for No edge: bet 0, with red for a negative edge and green for a real edge, showing Kelly is honest about bad setups.Edge below 0: skipNo edge: bet 0Edge: Kelly > 0
Wick saysWith no edge, Kelly says bet nothing. With a negative edge, it says skip the trade.

Recap: Kelly = (winrate x payoff_ratio − loss_rate) / payoff_ratio. It tells you the 'optimal' fraction to risk per trade. No edge equals zero. Negative edge equals don't trade. But pure Kelly is too aggressive for real trading — that's the next lesson.

Knowledge check

Answer before moving on.

0 / 2 answered

1. You have a 60% winrate and a payoff ratio b = 1 (average win equals average loss). What does Kelly tell you to risk per trade?

2. What does Kelly return when your edge is exactly zero (winrate equals loss_rate at b = 1)?

Lesson handoff

Pass the check before saving.

Use the knowledge check first. After you pass it, this card turns into the save-and-continue handoff.